Oscar Urbano v. SMG Holdings, Inc. et al
| Oscar Urbano |
| Does, SMG and SMG Holdings, Inc. |
| 5:2015cv00603 |
| March 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margaret M. Morrow |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Labor: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
203
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, in favor of Demetha Stroman against SMG. (twdb)
|
|
Filing
199
JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The jury trial scheduled to begin on June 13, 2017 is taken off-calendar. 2. All claims by Plaintiffs against Defendant SMG are hereby dismissed. 3. This document shall constitute a judgment for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. The court orders defendant to show cause in writing on or before April 13, 2015 why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. If defendant responds to this order to show cause, plaintiff may file a reply on or before April 20, 2015. Should defendant fail to respond to this order to show cause by April 13, 2015, the court will remand the case to state court forthwith. (jloz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
