Beverly Mileham v. Walmart Inc. et al
| Beverly Mileham |
| Sharay Fanio, Walmart Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 5:2019cv02408 |
| December 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Sheri Pym |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT (DKT. #9 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion, noticed for hearing on February 14, 2020, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 15 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 filed by Plaintiff Beverly Mileham. (Sadeghibahari, Soheil) |
| Filing 14 OPPOSITION in opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Graham Clark, #2 Declaration of Laura Mercer)(Eshelman, Carey) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing of the Proposed Order filed by Plaintiff Beverly Mileham. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sadeghibahari, Soheil) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Beverly Mileham, (Sadeghibahari, Soheil) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Clerk RE: Plaintiff's Motion filed 1/14/2020 #9 . Per Local Rule 7.1-1, counsel shall immediately file the Certificate of Interested Parties. Counsel shall immediately file a Proposed Order and email a Microsoft Word version of the Proposed Order to the chambers email address. (gk) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Beverly Mileham. Motion set for hearing on 2/14/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Sadeghibahari, Soheil) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 5/1/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-02408 AB (SPx). (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Sharay Fanio, Walmart Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Beverly Mileham. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/10/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/15/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 6)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Beverly Mileham, upon Defendant Walmart Inc. served on 9/12/2019, answer due 10/3/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Albert Damonte, Intake Specialist, CT Corporation System, Registered Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/17/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 6) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Beverly Mileham, upon Plaintiff Sharay Fanio served on 10/23/2019, answer due 11/13/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Laura Mercer-Co-manager, Age:31 y/o Race: Caucasian Sec: Female, Weight: 175lbs Hair: Blonde Height: 5'6" Eyes in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/1/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 6) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Eshelman, Carey) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart Inc., (Eshelman, Carey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Eshelman, Carey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVDS1926986 Receipt No: 0973-24958353 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Carey J. Eshelman, #2 Notice of Lodgment of State Court File, #3 Summons, #4 Complaint, #5 Civil Case Cover Sheet - State Court, #6 Certificate of Assignment, #7 Notice of Trial Setting Conference, #8 Proof of Service of Summons on Walmart, #9 Answer filed by Walmart, #10 Proof of Service of Summons on Fanio, #11 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Carey Jean Eshelman added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft))(Eshelman, Carey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
