Michael Aston v. Jay Aston et al
Michael Aston |
Robert Adams, Chris Bell, Jay Aston, James Stevenson, Peter Rizzo, Libertalia Entertainment, John Aston and Peter Risingham |
8:2008cv00181 |
February 15, 2008 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
Los Angeles |
Robert N. Block |
James V. Selna |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 CONSENT JUDGMENT and PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge James V. Selna: (See document for further details.) 11. M.Aston, along with his predecessors, successors, assigns, affiliates, parent corporations, subsidiaries, representatives, agents, offic ers, directors, and shareholders, including, without limitation, and any entity owned or affiliated with him, is hereby permanently enjoined from using or displaying the Mark in commerce in the UK in connection with the Goods and Services, including, without limitation, the promotion, advertising and marketing thereof, except under written license from the Band/LTD as set forth in Sections IV and V of the Settlement Agreement, attached hereto as EXHIBIT 3, with said Sections being incorporated a s if stated here. 12. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. 13. The entire action is dismissed with prejudice as to Chris Bell (if not already dismissed) and Libertalia; and the Counterclaim is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED: (rla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.