Everest Indemnity Insurance Company v. George V DeMarco et al
Everest Indemnity Insurance Company |
George V DeMarco and James P DeMarco |
8:2013cv00102 |
January 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Robert N. Block |
Cormac J. Carney |
Negotiable Instrument |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Court ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than May 17, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alt ernative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff filing a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (FRCivP 55b). (See document for further details.) (rla) |
Filing 6 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court ORDERS plaintiff's counsel, to show cause in writing no later than March 7, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of pr osecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Answer by the Defendants or Plaintiff's request for entry of default; Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (FRCivP 41). (See document for further details.) (rla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.