Robert P Mosier v. Steven C Canup
||Robert P Mosier
||Steven C Canup
||February 6, 2013
||California Central District Court
||Charles F. Eick
||Philip S. Gutierrez
|Nature of Suit:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 23, 2013
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing on or before May 1, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date, as anappropriate response to this Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond in writing, may result in the dismissal of the entire action: Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff OR Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff. (lw)
|May 13, 2013
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: On April 23, 2013, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") why the abovecaptioned action should not be dismissed for lack of prosec ution. See Dkt. # 10. Plaintiff was ordered to respond in writing by filing a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment or a Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment no later than May 1, 2013. On April 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Defau lt Judgment, but the document was stricken for failure to comply with the Courts Local Rules. See Dkts. # 11, 13-14. Because Plaintiff attempted to timely respond to the Courts OSC, the Court grants Plaintiff an additional thirty days to respond. Acc ordingly, the Court will consider the filing of a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment or a Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment by June 12, 2013 as an appropriate response to the OSC. Failure to respond in writing may result in dismissal of the action. RE:( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/12/2013.) (lw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.