Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC v. Dean Heimbach
Plaintiff: Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
Defendant: Dean Heimbach
Case Number: 8:2013cv00573
Filed: April 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Guilford
Presiding Judge: Arthur Nakazato
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: (NOTE CORRECT CASE NUMBER) The Court enters the following preliminary injunction order: (See document for details.) IT IS SO ORDERED. (rla)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC v. Dean Heimbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
Represented By: Nina Huerta
Represented By: Jennifer A Kenedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean Heimbach
Represented By: Marvin I Bartel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?