Joshua B Shapiro v. Oscar Guaroa Moquete et al
| Joshua B Shapiro |
| Oscar Guaroa Moquete, Officer Kamaron Sardar (Serial No. 37806) and Sgt. Mark Campell (Serial No. 31278) |
| 8:2014cv00550 |
| April 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| John E. McDermott |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt, Related to: Order 18 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/8/2016. [See Order for details.] (san)
|
|
Filing
2
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SHOULD NOT BE DENIED by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause on or before July 2, 2014, why his in forma pauperis applic ation should not be denied for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2). If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he shall have until July 2, 2014, to file a written response to this order to show cause.**See attached Order for details.** (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
