In Re Fremont General Corporation
Appellee: Fremont General Corporation
In Re: Fremont General Corporation
Appellant: Kyle R Walker
Case Number: 8:2014cv01017
Filed: July 3, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Audrey B. Collins
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr. After a full review of the record on appeal, the Court does not find that bankruptcy Court committed clear error in finding: (a) the Company Event occurred on 7/2/2007 when the escrow agent released the CRE assets to iStar and iStar took possession and control of them, and; (b) Appellants' Termination Date (as defined in the MCAs) was 6/29/2007 when Appellants admit they received their written notices of termination from FIL and FGC. Both findings are wel l supported by the weight of the evidence. Moreover, to the extent the Court either of those questions may be considered a mixed question of law and fact subject to de novo review by this court, the Court independently agrees with the bankruptcy cour t's findings asdiscussed more fully above. Because it is undisputed that Appellants MCAs only provided the 36-months' severance pay if Appellants' Termination Date followed a Company Event in time, those two findings of fact are dispos itive. Appellants "Termination Date" precededthe "Company Event" by three days, and Plaintiffs are not entitled to any severance benefits under the express terms of their MCAs. Because Appellants' have no claim against FGC fo r breach of the express terms of the MCAs (the only claim Appellants advanced below or on appeal), the bankruptcy court did not err in disallowing Appellants' bankruptcy claims, and the Court AFFIRMS the bankruptcy court's3/21/2014 disallow ing Appellants claims. The clerk is directed to enter the judgments on appeal, give notice, and return the physical records on appeal to the bankruptcy clerk. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8024. Appellees are to be awarded their costs on appeal, which shall be taxable in the bankruptcy court. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8021(a), (c). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Fremont General Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Fremont General Corporation
Represented By: Michael C Lieb
Represented By: Byron Z Moldo
Represented By: Karina B Sterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Fremont General Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Kyle R Walker
Represented By: Jess Robert Bressi
Represented By: Anna L Knafo
Represented By: Moses Lebovits
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?