Micro Imaging Technology, Inc. v. Michael W. Brennan et al.
| Micro Imaging Technology, Inc. |
| Michael W Brennan and Does |
| 8:2014cv01336 |
| August 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Arthur Nakazato |
| Josephine L. Staton |
| Securities/Commodities |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. On March 3, 2016, this Court issued monetary sanctions against Plaintiff's Counsel in the amount of $1,000. (Order, Doc. 34 .) Plaintiff's Counsel was ordered to pay these sanctions to the Clerk of Court no later than March 17, 2016. (Id.) To date, however, Plaintiff's Counsel has yet to make this ordered payment. The Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff's Counsel to show cause wh y he should not be held in contempt of court for failing to comply with an express court order. Failure to provide an adequate response by April 8, 2016 will result in further sanctions and a finding of contempt. Paying the above monetary sanctions to the Clerk of Court and filing a proof of payment will be sufficient to discharge this order to show cause. (dro)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. On its own motion, therefore, the Court hereby orders counsel to show cause why the Court should not dismiss this action, enter a default, and/or find the parties in contempt for counsel's failure to submit a Joint Rule 26(f) Report and completed ADR-01 form. No later than May 1, 2015, counsel shall submit a Joint Rule 26(f) Report, a completed ADR-01 form, and a separate written response explaining why counsel has failed to comply with the Courts filing deadlines. The Court VACATES the May 1, 2015 Scheduling Conference. (mba)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
