Chris Langer v. Mahir G. Gammo et al
Chris Langer |
DOES 1-10 and Mahir G. Gammo |
8:2014cv01544 |
September 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andrew J. Guilford |
Arthur Nakazato |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK, in favor of Plaintiff, Chris Langer against Defendant, Mahir G. Gammo 1. judgment was awarded by the court to plaintiff on 2/6/2015 in the amount of $7,357.50 and 2. Interest in the amount of $105.02 calculated at 0.17 percent from the date of judgment was entered on February 6, 2015 to June 29, 2023, for a Total Renewed Judgment of $7,462.52. Related to: APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Order on Application for Default Judgment, 16 , 28 . (shb) |
Filing 29 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK, in favor of Plaintiff, Chris Langer against Defendant, Mahir G. Gammo 1. judgment was awarded by the court to plaintiff on 2/6/2015 in the amount of $7,357.50 and 2. Interest in the amount of $105.02 calculated at 0.17 percent from the date of judgment was entered on February 6, 2015 to June 29, 2023, for a Total Renewed Judgment of $7,462.52. Related to: APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Order on Application for Default Judgment,, 16 28 (shb) |
Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford Re: Default Judgment in favor of Chris Langer against Mahir G. Gammo 15 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.