Kristin Hanson et al v. Harold La Flamme et al
| Kristin Hanson |
| Duke Jeffery Bussey, County of Orange, DOES, Harold La Flamme, Ann Morgan and Jeremiah Morgan |
| 8:2014cv01823 |
| November 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J. Guilford |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford,. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff, BRITTANY HOWARD, as Next Friend for R.M., shall take nothing by way of her First Amended Complaint against Defendants HAROLD LA FLAMME, JEREMIAH MORGAN, ANN MORGAN, and DUKE JEFFREY BUSSEY. Said Defendants shall recover from plaintiff BRITTANY HOWARD, as Next Friend for R.M., their costs incurred in this proceeding. 167 (es)
|
|
Filing
167
MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER REINSTATING AND CLARIFYING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: On June 25, 2019, the Court issued an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to appear, failure to prosecute, and failure to follow court orders. (Dkt. No. 162.) Upon receiving a declaration from former Plaintiff Kristin Hanson, the Court discharged its order to show cause. (Dkt No. 164.) But because Plaintiff R.M. is the only remaining Plaintiff in this case, that order to show cause was discharged in error. The Court thus REINSTATES its former order to show cause. Plaintiff R.M. is ORDERED to show cause in writing by August 9, 2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of p rosecution, failure to appear, and failure to follow court orders. Any response to this order to show cause from former Plaintiff Kristin Hanson (who voluntarily dismissed her claims on appeal and is no longer a party to this action) will not affect this order to show cause. (es)
|
|
Filing
162
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff R.M., to show cause in writing no later than July 5, 2019, why this action shoul d not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court notes that Plaintiff R.M. could face sanctions including attorney's fees, dismissal or monetary sanctions, for failure to appear at the status conference, failure to prosecute and failure to obey Court orders. (See document for further details) (es)
|
|
Filing
127
JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: All claims having been adjudicated in favor of Defendants 126 . See Order for details. (jtil)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
