Glenn Provost v. ILWU PMA Welfare Plan
Plaintiff: Glenn Provost
Defendant: ILWU PMA Welfare Plan
Case Number: 8:2014cv01982
Filed: December 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J. Carney
Presiding Judge: Douglas F. McCormick
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney remanding case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction to Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case number 30-2014-00743127. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glenn Provost v. ILWU PMA Welfare Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ILWU PMA Welfare Plan
Represented By: Aaron Belzer
Represented By: Nicholas R Clements
Represented By: Christine S Hwang
Represented By: Lindsay R Nicholas
Represented By: Kathleen Cahill Slaught
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glenn Provost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?