Noemi Baeza v. Assisted Credit Services Inc et al
Plaintiff: Noemi Baeza
Defendant: Assisted Credit Services Inc, Does and Medical Claim Management
Case Number: 8:2015cv01451
Filed: September 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F. McCormick
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 JUDGMENT ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In accordance with this Courts Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 42) 42 , the Court hereby orders judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Assisted Credit, in the total amount of $30,784.65, as follows: $16,000 in damages; $13,820.40 in attorneys fees; and $964.25 in costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vv)
May 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT ASSISTED CREDIT SERVICES, INC.S ANSWER AND ENTERING DEFAULT AGAINST ASSISTED CREDIT SERVICES [10, 33] by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court sua sponte STRIKES Assisted Credits Answer. (ECF No. 10.) The Court also ENTERS DEF AULT against Assisted Credit. While Plaintiff has already filed a Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 31), the Court finds that Motion premature and requests that Plaintiff refile the Motion on or before May 16, 2016. The Court will then take the matter under submission, and no hearing will be held. (lc). Modified on 5/5/2016 (lc).
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ENTRY OF DEFAULT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Defendant Assisted Credit Services is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, by 3/2/2016, why default should not be entered. No hearing will be held, and all pending dates and deadlines are vacated. Defendant may discharge this order by submitting a statement as to why counsel has not yet been obtained and specifying a date by which counsel will appear, or with the docketed appearance of counsel who may properly appear before this Court. (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noemi Baeza v. Assisted Credit Services Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Assisted Credit Services Inc
Represented By: Edward Thomas Weber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medical Claim Management
Represented By: Donald E Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noemi Baeza
Represented By: Jared M Hartman
Represented By: Babak Semnar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?