Rotroff v. Robinson et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv01419
Filed: October 10, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Dennis L. Beck
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 70 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending 69 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss be Granted, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/1/11. Referred to Judge O'Neill; 14-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
March 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions should not be Imposed for Failure to Comply or otherwise Respond to the Court's March 7, 2011 67 Order; Response Due within 30 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/31/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
March 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING 66 Notice of Settlement; ORDER REQUIRING Parties to File Appropriate Papers to Dismiss Action By March 18, 2011, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/5/2011. (Filing Deadline: 3/18/2011.) (Marrujo, C)
February 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to Respond within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/4/2011. Response due by 3/14/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
January 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Adopting 62 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/31/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
December 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER To SHOW CAUSE (Docs. 59 , 60 , 61 ), Response Due Within 20 Days, FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATION Recommending Motion For Reconsideration Be Denied, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/2/2010. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill.(Objections to F&R due by 12/27/2010), (Show Cause Response due by 12/27/2010)(Fahrney, E)
October 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/5/2010. The parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any they have, why they have failed to file dispositional documents or why this action should not be dismissed. The parties may comply with this order by filing a signed stipulation and proposed order regarding dismissal of this action. Show Cause Response due by 10/22/2010. (Bradley, A)
September 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER SETTING Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/4/09: Settlement Conference set for 10/6/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck.(Hellings, J)
August 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER Requiring Parties To Notify Court Whether A Settlement Conference Would Be Beneficial, Thirty-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/2/2009. (Case Management Deadline: 9/9/2009) (Scrivner, E)
July 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER adopting 44 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and GRANTING in part and DISREGARDING in part Defendant's 35 Motion for Summary Adjudication signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/21/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
February 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to Respond to 35 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/19/2009. (Filing due by 3/11/2009). (Jessen, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rotroff v. Robinson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?