Richards v. The People et al
Steven Louis Richards |
- The People and Attorney General for the State of California |
1:2007cv01805 |
December 7, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Sacramento |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
William M. Wunderlich |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Instant 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Denied; and the Clerk of Court be Directed to Enter Judgment in Favor of Respondent signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 05/17/2010. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 6/21/2010. (Flores, E) |
Filing 22 ORDER Granting Petitioner's Motion To Withdraw Claim Number One (Doc. 21 ), ORDER Denying Respondent's Motion To Dismiss (Doc. 16 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/24/2009. (Scrivner, E) |
Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING Petitioner Leave to Withdraw Unexhausted Claims, Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/14/2009. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to file a motion to withdraw the unexhausted claims. Motion due by 8/17/2009. (Arellano, S.) |
Filing 4 ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:07-CV-2638 LKK DAD HC) to Fresno Division (1:07-CV-1805 LJO WMW HC) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/12/07. (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.