J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. James et al
| J & J Sports Productions, Inc. |
| Tasha A. James and West Coast Pizza Concepts, Inc. |
| 1:2010cv01711 |
| September 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tulare |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS on Plaintiff's 26 Application for Default Judgment by the Court signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/7/2011. Objections due within fifteen (15) days of service of this recommendation. (Bradley, A)
|
|
Filing
22
Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for an Order VACATING the Case Management Conference; and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/23/2011. (Bradley, A)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING Defendants Tasha A. James Individually, Visalia Pizza Factory 1, and West Coast Pizza Concepts, Inc. In Light of Stipulation of Dismissal 12 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/7/2011. Tasha A. James and West Coast Pizza Concepts, Inc. TERMINATED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
11
Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing Scheduling Conference and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/30/2010. Initial Scheduling Conference continued to 2/16/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. (Bradley, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
