Castillo v. Haws
| Rudy Castillo |
| F B Haws |
| 1:2012cv00302 |
| February 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Sacramento |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/19/2015 recommending that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 12/24/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying 38 Motion for Stay and Abeyance signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/16/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE OPPOSITION OR NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS MOTION FOR A STAY 38 AND PERMITTING PETITIONER TO FILE A REPLY NO LATER THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF OPPOSITION signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/2/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING 31 Respondent's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/6/2013. Deadline: 7/10/2013. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT to File No Later Than Forty-Five (45) Days After Service of This Order a Response to the Petition in Accordance With the Court's Previous Order (Doc. 11 ); ORDER Permitting Petitioner to File a Traverse in Thirty (30) Days in Accordance With the Court's Previous Order; and ORDER Directing the Parties to Proceed in Accordance With the Court's Previous Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/11/2013. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Adopting 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING Respondent's 15 Motion to Dismiss the Petition; ORDER DISMISSING AS MOOT Petitioner's 17 Motion for Stay and Abeyance; ORDER REFERRING MATTER Back to the Magistrate to Direct a Response to the Petition signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/6/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/23/2012 recommending that 15 MOTION to DISMISS be denied and that 17 MOTION to STAY be dismissed as moot. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 11/29/2012(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:12-cv-0405 GGH HC) to Fresno (1:12-cv-0302 BAM HC) signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/29/2012; this court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed ifp. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Castillo v. Haws | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rudy Castillo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: F B Haws | |
| Represented By: | Paul Edward O'Connor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
