Johnson v. Sisodia, et al.
| Anthony Johnson |
| Dr. Sisodia, Nareddy, Edgar Clark and Teresa Macias |
| 1:2012cv02044 |
| December 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 50 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/13/2016. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 2/16/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER To SHOW CAUSE Why Defendants' Request For Extension Of Time Nunc Pro Tunc Should Not Be Denied (ECF No. 56 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/17/2015. Show Cause Response due by 9/28/2015.(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 45 Motion for Early Settlement signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/27/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 43 Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/03/2015. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Directing Defendants To File A Response To Plaintiff's Motion For Settlement Conference (ECF No. 45 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/23/2015. (Responses due by 8/26/2015) (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion To Extend Discovery Deadline, Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Imposition Of Sanctions, And Granting Defendants' Request To Extend Deadline To File Dispositive Motion (ECF Nos. 34 , 37 , 40 , 41 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/16/2015.(Discovery due by 7/1/2015, Dispositive Motions filed by 4/22/2015, Response to Motion Deadline 5/20/2015) (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Request For Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 38 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/9/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Response to 34 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Discovery Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/3/2015. Response due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery, Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Deadline to Amend the Pleadings, and Granting Defendant's Request to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests re[ 28], 29 , 31 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/22/14. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to FILE an Opposition or Statement of No Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Motion for Extension of Deadline to Amend the Pleadings signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/22/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Ruling on his Fourteenth Amendment Claim signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/21/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Resend Copy of the Court's December 19, 2013, Order 14 and Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Court's Order 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/30/13. 30-Day Deadline.(Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying 10 Motion for court order to allow access to the law library signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/9/2013. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 9 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/2/2013. (Fahrney, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
