Tung v. Brown et al
| Balwinder Singh Tung |
| Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey Beard and J. Clark Kelso |
| 1:2013cv00269 |
| February 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 25 Application to Proceed IFP as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/23/17. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Adopting 17 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Dismissing Action with Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim Under 1983; ORDER that Dismissal is Subject to 28 USC 1915(g); ORDER for Clerk to Close Case, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/18/16. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that Plaintiff's 14 Second Amended Complaint be Dismissed, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 08/29/2016. Referred to Judge Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 10/3/2016.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
11
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Case with Prejudice re 9 , for Failure to State a Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 03/24/15. Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections, If Any, Duw Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
