Ha v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
| Thuan Huy Ha |
| U.S. Department of Justice and Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys |
| 1:2013cv01588 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations, Dismissing Complaint for Failure to Follow a Court Order, and Directing Clerk of Court to Terminate Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/6/16. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
11
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION FOR A FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 2/19/2016 signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/14/2016.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER to Submit Service Documents or ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With Court Order and Local Rules, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/15/15: Thirty (30) Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend 1 , and Denying as Moot Motion for Status 5 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/18/14. 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Granting 3 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/22/2013. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
