Cheshier v. Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff: Deanna Cheshier
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company
Case Number: 1:2014cv01265
Filed: August 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: UnassignedDJ
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/25/2016 ORDERING that this action is voluntarily DISMISSED without prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
November 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/20/2015. (Timken, A)
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/15/15 DECLINING 32 Notice of Related Case - ATY filed by Eli Lilly and Company, 31 Notice of Related Case - ATY filed by Eli Lilly and Company. (Meuleman, A)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 04/09/15 DENYING 22 Motion to Change Venue. (Benson, A)
February 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 02/12/15 ( Discovery due by 5/26/2016., Last hearing date for a motion is set for 7/25/2016 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. Final Pret rial Conference set for 9/26/2016 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr., The parties shall file a joint pretrial statement no later than 7 days prior to the final pretrial conference., Jury Trial set for 12/6/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.) (Plummer, M)
January 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/23/2015 ORDERING that actions 1:14-cv-01265-GEB-SKO and 2:14-cv-01890-WBS-CKD are RELATED. Therefore, action 2:14-cv-01890-WBS-CKD is reassigned to District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto for all further proceedings, and any date currently set in the reassigned case is VACATED. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall show the initials "GEB-SKO." Further, a Status Conference is scheduled in 2:14-cv-01890 before the Judge Burrell on 2/23/2015, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior. (Zignago, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cheshier v. Eli Lilly and Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Cheshier
Represented By: Michael L. Baum
Represented By: Robert Brent Wisner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?