Glass v. Gregory et al
| Donald Glass |
| A. Gregory, S Duran, M. Galvin, J. R. Garza, J. Stiles, Greg Blanchi and T Arlitz |
| 1:2014cv01703 |
| October 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER denying Motion for New Trial signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 7/8/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 25 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 4/12/16. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING 32 Motion and AMENDING Scheduling and Planning Order, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/2/16. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Re: Notice at Docket 27 , signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 11/12/15: Plaintiff is granted through and including Friday, December 11, 2015, within which to serve and file his opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER re 25 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 10/19/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Denying Motion To Amend Complaint (Doc. 22 ), signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/4/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER striking 16 Amended Complaint signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 7/28/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
