Boudreau v. Commissioner of Social Security
Maurice Raymond Boudreau |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2015cv00088 |
January 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Stanislaus |
Stanley A. Boone |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES. Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND dollars and ZERO cents ($7,000.00). Order signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/19/2018. (Timken, A) |
Filing 25 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Granting Plaintiff's Social Security Appeal and Remanding for Further Administrative Proceedings, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/19/18. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 21 ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiffs opening brief shall be filed on or before March 26, 2018; Defendants responsive pleading shall be filed on or before April 25, 2018; Plaintiffs reply, if any, s hall be filed on or before May 10, 2018; and The parties are reminded that due to the impact of social security cases on the Courts docket and the Courts desire to have cases decided in an expedient manner, requests for modification of the briefing scheduling will not routinely be granted and will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good c ause for the delay in seeking an extension. If done after a deadline, the party seeking an extension must show additional good cause why the matter was filed late with the request for nunc pro tunc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/14/2018. (Hernandez, M) |
Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Vacate Dismissal of Action and Vacating the March 26, 2015 Order Dismissing This Action and Judgment, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/11/17. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending dismissing 1 action for failure to pay filing fee, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/3/2015. Matter is referred to Judge O' Neill. Objections to F&R due by 3/20/2015. (Figueroa, O) |
Filing 4 ORDER DENYING Motion to Proceed IFP 3 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/21/15: Thirty Day Deadline. (Hellings, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boudreau v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Maurice Raymond Boudreau | |
Represented By: | Jacqueline Anna Forslund |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.