Moore v. Zamzami et al
| Ronald Moore |
| Nagi Mohsen Zamzami, Khadiga M. Zamzami, Mohamed M. Muthana and Amria M. Alzamzami |
| 1:2015cv00480 |
| March 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER Granting Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1); ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case and Adjust Docket to Reflect Voluntary Dismissal re 16 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/24/15. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER requiring parties to file dispositional documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/9/2015. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
13
Third Stipulation to extend time for Defendants Nagi Mohsen Zamzami, individually and dba City Wide Market; Khadiga M. Zamzami; Mohamed M. Muthana, individually and dba City Wide Market; and Amira M. Alzamzami to respond to the complaint; Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/12/2015. (Response due by 6/30/2015) (Rosales, O)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to extend time for defendants to respond to complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/18/2015. (Hernandez, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
