California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. A.L. Gilbert Company
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant: A.L. Gilbert Company
Case Number: 1:2015cv00533
Filed: April 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Stanislaus
Presiding Judge: UnassignedDJ
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to CLOSE the CASE signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/20/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
June 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 54 STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Deadline for Submission of Dismissal Documents, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/27/2016. (The time for Plaintiff to file the appropriate dismissal documents in the above-captioned matter is extended from 6/24/2016, to 7/29/2016, to allow the parties time to complete the process set out in the settlement agreement executed on 4/21/2016.)(Gaumnitz, R)
October 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STIPULATION and ORDER for EXTENSION of Time to Respond to California Sportfishing Protection Alliance's Discovery Requests, 39 . Defendant A.L. Gilbert Company's responses to Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance&# 039;s Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant, Set One, Request for Production of Documents to Defendant, Set Two, and Requests for Admissions to Defendant, Set One, shall be due on October 26, 2015. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/20/2015. (Timken, A)
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/24/2015 GRANTING 34 Stipulation and Proposed Order re First Request for Entry onto Designated Property. (Zignago, K.) Modified on 9/25/2015 (Zignago, K.).
August 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER EXTENDING the Time for Defendants to Respond to the Complaint 20 . Defendant shall have up to and including August 10, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/4/2015. (Timken, A)
June 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Stipulation to continue case management conference; Order Thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/1/2015. (Telephonic Case Management currently set for 6/30/2015 is CONTINUED to 7/28/2015 at 09:15 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto; Scheduling Conference currently set for 7/23/2015 has been CONTINUED to 8/25/2015 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto) (Rosales, O)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. A.L. Gilbert Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A.L. Gilbert Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Represented By: Drevet John Hunt
Represented By: Caroline A. Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?