Johnson v. On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner: Steven A. Johnson
Respondent: On Habeas Corpus
Case Number: 1:2015cv00600
Filed: April 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Merced
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 53 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the petition be denied with prejudice re 48 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ; referred to Judge DROZD,signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 08/26/178. Objections to F&R due by 10/2/2017 (Martin-Gill, S)
February 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and to DENY Motions for Injunctive Relief; ORDER GRANTING Leave to Amend Petition and ORDER DENYING Motion for Default Judgment, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/02/2017. ( Amended Complaint due 30-Day Deadline) 27 , 36 , 38 , 42 , 18 and 19 (Martin-Gill, S)
May 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER requiring Petitioner to submit signed Declaration signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/2/2016. ( Filing Deadline: 5/26/2016.) (Lundstrom, T)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Failure to State a Cognizable Claim; RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss Motions for Injunctive Relief 18 , 19 , 27 , 36 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/4/16: Matter referred to Judge Drozd; Fourteen-Day Objection Deadline. (Hellings, J)
June 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER WITHDRAWING 4 Findings and Recommendation to Dismiss Petition; REQUIRING RESPONDENT to Submit Answer Addressing Merits of Petition; ORDER REQUIRING Respondent to Submit Notice of Appearance; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Serve Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/17/2015. (Marrujo, C)
April 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner's right to file a civil rights action pursuant to 42:1983; Clerk of Court to assign a District Court Judge to the present matter re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Steven A. Johnson ; referred to Judge Ishii; New case number is: 1:15-cv-00600-AWI-MJS (HC), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/26/2015. Objections to F&R due by 5/14/2015 (Martin-Gill, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. On Habeas Corpus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven A. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: On Habeas Corpus
Represented By: Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel
Represented By: Litigation Coordinator
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- 2241 Unit(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?