Carrasquilla et al v. Tulare County
Carlos Carrasquilla and Alba Lyda Carrasquilla |
Tulare County |
1:2015cv00740 |
May 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Tulare |
UnassignedDJ |
Barbara A. McAuliffe |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 ORDER DISMISSING Action With Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/20/17. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 65 ORDER FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT; VACATING DATES AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE DISPOSITIVE DOCUMENTS BY APRIL 19, 2017 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/22/2017: It is hereby ordered that all pending matters and dates in this action are VACATED; and the parties shall file dispositional documents on or before April 19, 2017. (Valdez, E) |
Filing 62 ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE set for 2/22/2017 at 10:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/8/2017. (Hernandez, M) |
Filing 58 ORDER Regarding Defendant Stacey Zeller Johnson's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/27/2016. (Herman, H) |
Filing 45 Amended Stipulation to Dismiss Defendants From the Above Captioned Matter and ORDER Thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/22/16. Santos Salgado, Maxwell Vargas, Samuel Anderson, and Roman Garcia terminated. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 33 ORDER (re Doc. 32 Stipulation): (1.) The deadline for expert disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(a)(2) on the issue of neurology only shall be continued from August 12, 2016, to September 12, 2016; and (2.) The deadline for rebuttal/supplemental expert reports on the issue ofneurology only shall be continued from September 2, 2016, to October3, 2016; (3.) All other dates and deadlines remain unchanged. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/16/2016. (Herman, H) |
Filing 31 ORDER re Stipulation of the Parties (Doc. 30) to Continue Expert Disclosure and Supplemental Expert Disclosure Deadlines: (1.) The Deadline for Expert Disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2) shall be continued from July 1, 2016, to August 12, 2016; and (2.) The Deadline for Supplemental Expert Disclosures shall be continued from July 22, 2016, to September 2, 2016. (3.) All other dates remain as set in the Scheduling Order. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/15/2016. (Herman, H) |
Filing 29 STIPULATED Protective ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/8/2016. (Herman, H) |
Filing 19 ORDER Filed Concurrently with Stipulation of the Parties to Substitute Individual Named Defendants for Doe Defendants 1 Through 6 in the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/8/16. Stacey Zeller, Samuel Anderson, Maxwell Vargas, Roman Garcia, Santos Salgado and Stacy Johnson added. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 7 Parties' Joint Stipulation and ORDER to Continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Hearing Date and Extend Time for Filing of Response to the Complaint. Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter, currently set for September 22, 2015, is v acated and continued to October 27, 2015, at 09:00 a.m., in Department 8 (BAM) before Judge McAuliffe. Further, the responsive pleading is now due on or before October 1, 2015. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/17/2015. (Herman, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.