Windham v. Rubio et al
Charles W. Windham |
R. Rubio, J. Vargas, T. Cano and Dave Davey |
1:2015cv01224 |
August 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Jennifer L. Thurston |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER DISCHARGING 9 Order to Show Cause; WITHDRAWING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss; and PARTIALLY GRANTING Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File a First Amended Complaint; 45-Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/19/2016. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action be DISMISSED, With Prejudice, for Plaintiff's Failure Both to Obey a Court Order and to Prosecute This Action and That Plaintiff be Given a Strike Under 42 USC 1915(g) re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/17/2016. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 9 ORDER To SHOW CAUSE Why The Action Should Not Be Dismissed For Plaintiff's Failure To Comply With The Court's Order (Docs. 1 , 7 ), 30-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/8/2015. Show Cause Response due by 1/13/2016. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (Doc. 1 ), 30-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/22/2015. First Amended Complaint due by 11/30/2015. (Fahrney, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.