Griffiths v. Tolson et al
Plaintiff: Steven Griffiths
Defendant: R. Tolson and K. Ramirez
Case Number: 1:2015cv01226
Filed: August 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER Regarding Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal, with Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/15/18. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
February 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER Following Settlement; Vacating Dates and Directing Parties to File Dispositive Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/8/18. (Gonzalez, R)
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT Steven Griffiths, CDCR# H-21488 on February 8, 2018 at 9:30 a.m., Courtroom 9, 6th Floor at United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/11/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
November 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Post-Screening ADR and STAYING CASE for 120 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/16/2017. Settlement Conference set for 2/8/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Sant Agata, S)
October 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER DENYING 35 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/4/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
September 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER to Recaption Case signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 09/11/2017. (Flores, E)
July 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Denying 27 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 07/24/2017. (Flores, E)
July 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and ORDER DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/20/2017. R. Tolson terminated. (Jessen, A)
June 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Dismissal of Certain Claims and Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 06/23/2017. Referred to Judge O'Neill.(Flores, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffiths v. Tolson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Griffiths
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Tolson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?