J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Barajas et al
Plaintiff: J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant: Miguel Angel Barajas and Guillermina Carrizales
Case Number: 1:2015cv01354
Filed: September 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's 30 Renewed Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/2/2017. (Gaumnitz, R)
August 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/4/2016. (Plaintiff's 31 Request to Continue is GRANTED, Plaintiff's 30 Renewed Motion for Award of Costs and Attorneys' Fees is hereby continued from 8/16/2016, to 10/18/2016 at 9:30 am before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Gaumnitz, R)
May 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Costs and Attorneys' Fees, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/18/2016. (Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees and costs is granted in part and denied in p art as follows: a. Plaintiff's motion for attorneys fees is denied without prejudice to the filing of a properly supported motion within twenty-one days of the date of this order; b. Plaintiff's motion for costs is granted in part and den ied in part without prejudice to the filing of a properly supported motion as to the denied costs within twenty-one days of the date of this order; and c. Defendant is ordered to pay plaintiff's cost in the amount of $520.00.) (Gaumnitz, R)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending Granting in Part 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/7/2016. Referred to District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Hall, S)
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING 12 Request to Continue Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/17/2015. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 1/19/2016 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Personal appearances required. (Hall, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Barajas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Peter Riley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miguel Angel Barajas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guillermina Carrizales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?