Rangel v. Nabil, et al
Case Number: 2:2002cv01633
Filed: August 1, 2002
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 150 ORDER GRANTING Request for Authority to Incur Costs by appointed Pro bono counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/24/2012. (Crouch, J)
October 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/20/11 ORDERING that the 10/26/11 hearing on defendants motion for summary judgment, and the 11/16/11 pretrial conference, areVACATED; RECOMMENDING that 140 MO TION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT be granted; the Clerk be directed to enter judgment in defendants' favors; and the Clerk be directed to close this case. Motion referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
March 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/15/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 126 motion to modify the scheduling order is GRANTED in that (1a) the clerk is to file the 133 proposed amended cmplt as a fourth amended cmplt, (1b) the di scovery deadline is EXTENDED to 5/25/2011; the 6/22/10 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order is further amended as to (2a) the dispositive motions deadline is CONTINUED to 7/18/2011, (2b) Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 10/5/2011 at 11:00 AM i n Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan, (2c) Jury Trial is CONTINUED to 1/10/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.; dfts' 128 motion for summary judgment is DENIED w/out prejudice; the 3/3/2011 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED; and pltf to complete service of process on dfts Andreason and Bick w/in 30 days, dfts' response to the fourth amended cmplt to be filed w/in 30 days thereafter. (Yin, K)
March 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/2/2011 ORDERING dft to Show Cause, w/in 7 days, why he should not be taxed the costs for appearance of pltf's counsel at the 3/2/2011 hearing; additionall, the hearing is CONTINUED to 3/4/2011, at 9:30 am, in Courtroom No. 24. (Yin, K)
August 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/06/10; GRANTING 121 Motion to Continue; Status Conference RE-set for 9/8/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Williams, D)
July 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/28/10 ORDERING that a Status Conference is set for 8/11/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Dillon, M)
May 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/11/10. Status (Pretrial scheduling) Conference set for 5/26/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. On or before Thursday, 5/20/10, the parties shall file status reports.(Dillon, M)
May 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/6/2010 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 111 ADOPTED in Full; Claims against California Medical Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice; and Claims against the California Attorney General are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Reader, L)
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/25/2010 ORDERING that pltf is granted leave to file a third amended cmplt and service is appropriate for dft Athanassious; the clerk to provide pltf forms for se rvice to be comleted and returned w/in 14 days, along w/ the Notice of Submission; and RECOMMENDING that claims against CMF be dismissed w/ predjudice and claims against the AG be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Plf's counsel served by mail w/ 1 USM-285 forms, 1 summ, an inst sheet and 1 copy of the 2/11/10 amended cmplt. (Yin, K)
November 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/16/09 ORDERING that the 11/18/09 status conference is VACATED; and it is further ORDERED that pltf shall file a second amended cmplt w/in 30 days; the court will order service as it deems appropriate. (Yin, K)
October 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/1/09 ORDERING that Jay Dyer is appointed to represent plaintiff for all further proceedings; Clerk is directed to substitute Mr. Dyer in place of plaintiff who previously was proceeding pro se; Status Conference set for 11/18/09 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 25 before Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Both parties shall appear by counsel at the status conference and shall be prepared to discuss how this matter should proceed. Not later than 14 day s prior to the conference, the parties shall file and serve status reports. Jay Dyer shall notify shall notify Sujean Younger, ADR and Pro Bono Program Director, if he has any questions related to the appointment. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Jay Dyer. (cc ADR)(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rangel v. Nabil, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?