Rameses v. Lacey, et al
Petitioner: Robert Rameses
Respondent: Gary Lacey, Paul Sutherland, County of El Dorado Superior Court and Scott Kernan
Case Number: 2:2004cv01173
Filed: June 21, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/28/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/4/11 95 are ADOPTED in full; Petitioner's third MOTION for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), filed on 9/2/11 94 is DISMISSED; And Any further filings from Petitioner in this closed case are to disregarded. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/3/2011 ORDERING the clerk to substitute ptnr pro se for appointed counsel and serve ptnr by mail at MCSP address; and RECOMMENDING ptnr's 94 third motion for relief from judgment be dismissed; and any further filings from ptnr in this closed case be disregarded. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
December 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER adopting in full 87 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 12/10/10. Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) is DISMISSED.(Kastilahn, A)
October 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 87 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/8/2010 85 Motion for Relief from Judgment be dismissed. Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Matson, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rameses v. Lacey, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Rameses
Represented By: E. Arthur Pirelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gary Lacey
Represented By: Justain Paul Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Paul Sutherland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: County of El Dorado Superior Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Kernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?