Rodriguez v. Muntz et al
| 2:2005cv02013 |
| October 6, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Ralph R. Beistline |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/8/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed as moot. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/01/10 ordering petitioner shall file a brief with the court within 21 days of the filing of this order addressing whether federal habeas relief is still available to petitioner in light of his rele ase on parole or whether this action has been rendered moot by his release from prison. Respondent shall file, no later than 14 days thereafter a reply to petitioner's brief. Petitioner may file, no later than 7 days after the filing of respondent's brief, a reply. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Muntz et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
