Lujan v. Yates
| 2:2006cv00923 |
| May 17, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 2/10/2011 ORDERING that Ptnr's request for evidentiary hearing is DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the 22 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/1/2010 ORDERING 41 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full and denying 33 Motion to Dismiss; Petitioner may file a reply to respondent's 2/11/2010 answer w/i 30 days of the date of this order. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
41
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/17/09 recommending that respondent's 03/19/09 motion to dismiss 33 be denied. Respondent be directed to file and serve an answer and not a motion in response to petitioner's application within 60 days. Petitioner be directed to file his reply, if any, within 30 days of service of the answer. Motion to Dismiss 33 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/13/2009 DENYING petitioner's 39 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/20/09 ORDERING respondent to file a response to 22 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus w/in 60 days; reply due w/in 30 days of answer; if response is a motion, opposition or statement of non-opposition due w/in 30 days of motion, reply due w/in 15 days thereafter; petitioner's 30 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED w/out prejudice; and petitioner's 28 request to file a traverse is DENIED as unnecessary.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lujan v. Yates | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
