Armentero v. Kramer et al
| 2:2006cv01838 |
| August 17, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/23/2010 ADOPTING 74 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; Plaintiff's 73 Motion to alter the judgment is DENIED. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
74
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/05/10 recommending that plaintiff's motion to alter the judgment 73 be denied. Motion to Alter the Judgment 73 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/3/09 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 63 are ADOPTED IN FULL; dft Taylor's motion for summary judgment 48 is GRANTED. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/21/09 ordering plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 64 is granted. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file and serve objections to the 07/24/09 findings and recommendations. Plaintiff's motion for a jury trial 62 is denied without prejudice until the final resolution of the pending motions for summary judgment. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
63
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/11/09 RECOMMENDING that dft Taylor's 48 motion for summary judgment be granted. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 20 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/24/09 ORDERING that plaintiffs motion for the appointment of counsel 58 is DENIED; Plaintiffs motion for the entry of default 54 is denied; and plaintiffs requests that the court set a trial date 56 and 57 are DENIED without prejudice. It is RECOMMENDED that 59 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT be denied as untimely. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armentero v. Kramer et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
