Woods v. Carey et al
| 2:2006cv01857 |
| August 18, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/19/12 denying 106 Motion for disqualification and denying 107 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
104
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/3/12 RECOMMENDING that 97 Motion to Dimsiss be granted and the case dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/6/12 DENYING 101 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and plaintiffs surreply will be disregarded. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/20/2012, DENYING plaintiff's 98 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/24/12 denying 85 Motion to Dismiss. Within 14 days of the date of this order, defendants may re-file and re-serve the 02/27/12 motion to dismiss. Defendants must contemporaneously serve wit h the motion, but in a separate document, a copy of the attached Wyatt Notice which provides plaintiff with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust. If defendants re-serve their motion, plaintiff may therea fter file and serve an amended opposition within 30 days. If plaintiff fails to file an amended opposition, the court will consider his existing opposition in resolving defendants' motion. See 03/19/12 filing entitled "plaintiff's objections to defendants' notice of motion to dismiss 91 . If plaintiff files an amended opposition, defendants may thereafter file an amended reply within 14 days.. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER denying 90 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/03/12. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/3/2012 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 76 are ADOPTED in FULL; and plaintiff's # 75 Motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/15/11 DENYING 77 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/14/11 ORDERING service is appropriate for defendants Carey and Cervantes. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff 2 USM-285 forms, 1 summons, instruction s heet and a copy of the 05/19/11 fifth amended complaint to be completed and returned within 30 days. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 08/30/11 motion for injunctive relief 75 be denied. MOTION for injunctive relief 75 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 68 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/20/11. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/24/11 ordering that plaintiff's 4th amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/02/10 ordering that plaintiff's objections construed as a motion for reconsideration and recusal 60 is denied. Plaintiff shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, file an amended complaint in accordance with the court's 09/23/10 order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER denying 60 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/20/10. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/23/10 ORDERING that plaintiffs third amended complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER ADOPTING 47 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 7/22/2010. Plaintiff's due process claim against defendant Cervantes is DISMISSED with prejudice. With the exception of plaintiff's cognizable retaliation claim against Cervantes, all claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiff bringing them in separate civil rights actions. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/26/10 ORDERING the Claims against dft Carey are dismissed with leave to amend. w/i 30 days of service, pltf may amend his complaint against dft Carey; the Cler k shall provide to pltf a blank summons, a copy of the complaint filed 1/31/07, 1 USM-285 form and instructions for service of process on dft Cervantes. W/i 30 days pltf may return the attached Notice of Submission of Documents with the completed su mmons, the completed USM-285 form, and 2 copies of the 1/31/07 complaint. The court will transmit them to the USM for service of process. Dft Cervantes will be required to respond to pltf's allegations. In this event, the court will construe p ltf's election to proceed as consent to an order dismissing his defective claims against dft Carey without prejudice; and RECOMMENDING that pltf's due process claim against dft Cervantes be dismissed with prejudice and that all remaining claims be dismissed without prejudice to pltf bringing them in separate civil rights actions. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr; Objections due w/i 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woods v. Carey et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
