Hogue v. California Board of Prison Hearings et al
| Brian Hogue |
| California Board of Prison Hearings and Attorney General of the State of California |
| 2:2008cv01056 |
| May 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Solano |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 1/28/11 VACATING 28 Findings and Recommendations and RECOMMENDING that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Objections due within 21 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
28
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 12/13/10 RECOMMENDING Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus be GRANTED with respect to Claim I; and Respondent be directed to release Petitioner from custo dy, within 10 days after any order adopting these findings and recommendations, in accordance with the 10/4/06 decision of the Board finding Petitioner suitable for parole. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr; Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
