Dearmon v. Iwanick et al
| Robert Earl Dearmon |
| S Iwanick, Author Pagsolingan and Aries Pagsolingan |
| 2:2008cv02834 |
| November 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Solano |
| Morrison C. England |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/22/11, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Matter referred to Judge England. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within seven days after service of the objections. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/09/11 ordering that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/31/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 11/16/10 Motion for Reconsideration 69 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/2/2010 ORDERING that the 67 findings and recommendations filed September 22, 2010, are adopted in full. Defendant Iwanick is DISMISED. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/21/2010. Defendants' 60 Motion to Consolidate Cases is GRANTED. Case # 09-CV-1309 LKK KJN P is now CONSOLIDATED with 08-CV-2834 MCE KJM PS and thereby a dministratively CLOSED. Since actions have been consolidated, plaintiff's 65 66 Motions for Postponement are DENIED but Court will revise the Scheduling Order. Discovery shall now be completed by 1/19/2011 and Dispositive Motions shall be noticed to by heard on 3/23/2011. Court is RECOMMENDING that defendant Iwanick be dismissed. Within 21 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/20/10 re 60 ORDERING that opposition, if any, shall be filed no later than September 20, 2010. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than September 27, 2010. The matter shall thereafter stand submitted. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/30/10 ORDERING that the status conference set for 4/14/10 is VACATED; each party shall file a status conference report by 4/14/10; no later than 4/14/10 deft Aries Pagsolingan shall provide information available to him regarding the location at which deft S. Iwanick may be served with summons; pltf's 40 , 43 Replies are stricken; deft's 47 ex parte application for extension of time is DENIED as moot. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/29/09 ORDERING that 11/4/09 status conference be vacated; each party is required to file a status conference report by 11/4/09; Deft Author Pagsolingan shall provide any information available to him re the location of defts S. Iwanick and Aries Pagsolingan by 11/4/09. (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
