Stringham v. Bick et al
| Guy T. Stringham |
| J. Bick, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Medical Facility, J. Elias, R. Perez, D. Jones, J. Pearson, T. Donahue, J. Thomas, R. Andreason, N. Grannis, M. Cry, N. Khoury, S. Murray, S. Moreno and T. Schwartz |
| 2:2009cv00286 |
| January 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Sacramento |
| Morrison C. England |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/29/14 DISMISSING ACTION with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A). CASE CLOSED.(Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/12/14 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Guy T. Stringham via video conferencing at 10:00 am on July 10, 2014 before Judge Dale A. Drozd. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian. (cc: IT Dept)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/2/2014. Within 21 days of date of this Order, each party shall inform Court, in writing, as to whether they wish to proceed with a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Drozd or if they wish to be referred to Courts Mediation Program. If parties wish to proceed before the Magistrate Judge Drozd, each party shall return to the Consent form for Settlement Conference provided with this Order. If parties do not wish Magistrate Judge Drozd to preside at Settlement Conference, each party shall file a Declaration stating he wishes to a referral Courts Mediation Program. Clerk directed to send each party the Consent form for Settlement Conferences. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/25/2014 ORDERING that the 89 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's 76 renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendants' 68 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's 92 Motion to Strike is DENIED as unnecessary. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
89
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/10/13 RECOMMENDING that 76 motion for summary judgment be denied; Defendants motion for summary judgment 68 be granted in part and denied in part (see order for details). Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/19/13 ordering plaintiff's motion to remove defense counsel and strike portions of the record 64 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions 75 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to seal documents and/or for a protective order 83 is denied. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/6/13 ORDERING that plaintiffs July 12, 2012 motion for summary judgment 58 is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal with the filing of plaintiffs opposition to defendants crossmotion for sum mary judgment. Plaintiff shall renew his motion for summary judgment merely by filing with his opposition only a notice of motion for summary judgment. Thereafter plaintiffs renewed motion for summary judgment will be submitted for findings and recommendations on all the papers on file following the filing of defendants reply in support of their cross- motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs August 27, 2012 motion for protective order 62 is DENIED. Within 14 days from the date of this order defendants shall file and serve a response to plaintiffs September 20, 2012 motion to remove current defense counsel and strike plaintiffs September 12, 2012 deposition 64 .(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/18/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of time 69 is GRANTED; and Plaintiff shall place his opposition in the mail on or before 3/18/2013. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/15/12 ORDERING that 65 Motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order is GRANTED IN PART; Defendants Andreasen, Moreno and Thomas shall serve their responses to plaintiffs interrogatories on or before November 21, 2012; and Defendants shall file and serve their opposition to plaintiffs pending motion for summary judgment and their cross-motion for summary judgment, if any, on or before December 21, 2012. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/7/12 ADOPTING in full 49 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING IN PART 44 Motion to Dismiss and DENYING Motion to Strike. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date this order is electronically filed in which to file a second amended complaint clarifying whether he is bringing this action against the individual defendants in their official capacity, against CDCR and CMF, or against both. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
49
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/28/11 recommending that defendants' motion to strike pursuant to Rule 12(f) 44 be denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) 44 be granted in part. Plaintiff be granted 30 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations in which to file a second amended complaint clarifying whether he is bringing this action against the individual defendants in their official capacity, against CDCR and CMF or against both. MOTION to DISMISS 44 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/29/2011 ORDERING 34 that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge 33 is AFFIRMED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/25/11 ORDERING that Defendants 17 motion to declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant and require security is DENIED; Defendants 18 request for judicial notice is G RANTED; Plaintiffs 24 motion to strike is DENIED; and plaintiffs 28 motion for a court order is DENIED. It is RECOMMENDED that defendant Murray be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/02/10 ordering the clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff 1 summons, 1 USM-285 form, instruction sheet and a copy of the 03/18/10 amended complaint to be completed and returned within 60 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/13/10 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is directed to return to plaintiff the copy of the amended complaint submitted by plaintiff on 3/18/10; and within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit to the court the complete copies of the amended complaint, all 187 pages, required to effect service.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/26/10, ORDERING that service of the amended complaint is appropriate for dfts Bick, Donahue, Anderson, Khoury, Thomas, Murray and Morreno. The Clerk shall send pltf seven USM-285 forms, one summons , an instruction sheet, and a copy of the amended complaint filed 3/18/10. Within 30 days from the date of this order, pltf shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit to the court w/all the required documents. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/10/10 ORDERING that 7 Findings and Recommendations are VACATED; Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to file an amended complaint. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the courts form for filing a civil rights action.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
