Williams v. Grannis, et al
Plaintiff: John Wesley Williams
Defendant: Nola Grannis, -- Baughman, Dale Hamad, J. Garcia, R Loredo, D. Goodrich, T. Brown, G. Whitted and Y. Vasquez
Case Number: 2:2009cv01245
Filed: May 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/04/11 ordering all pending motions 53 , 54 , 55 , 58 , 59 are denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. (Plummer, M)
June 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/02/11 the deadlines for taking plaintiff's deposition and for filing any motion necessary to compel his appearance are extended to 07/22/11; and the dispositive motion deadline is extended by 30 days, or until 10/03/11. (Plummer, M)
May 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/25/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 44 motion to extend the time to file a motion to compel is GRANTED, the parties may conduct discovery, including filing any motions necessary to compel discovery, until 7/8/2011; pltf's 46 motion to vacate order is DENIED; and pltf's 47 motion to compel discovery is DENIED. (Yin, K)
January 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 01/12/11 ADOPTING in full 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; GRANTING 27 Motion to Dismiss Claim Two. Defendants are directed to file a responsive pleading with regard to the other claims within twenty-eight days. (Williams, D)
December 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/14/10 recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss claim 2, alleging violations of plaintiff's First and Eighth Amendment rights, as to defendant Bishop [27 ] should be granted for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Defendants be directed to file a responsive pleading with regard to the other claims within 28 days of adoption of these findings and recommendations, should that occur. MOTION to DISMISS 27 referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
April 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/6/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 19 ADOPTED IN FULL; dfts CDCR and Lieber are DISMISSED from this action; and pltf's claim under the Fourteenth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, the ADA Section 504 of the Rehabilittion Act of 1973, and CA Govt Code Section 11135 are DISMISSED. (Carlos, K)
April 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve process w/in 10 days on dfts Wenkler and Bishop signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/1/2010. The clerk is directed to fwd to the USM documents for service, the form re consent or request for reassignment and this order. The clerk shall also send pltf a copy of the Local Rules. (Yin, K)
February 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/23/2010 ORDERING that service is appropriate for dfts Bishop and Wenkler; the clerk to send pltf forms for service to be completed and returned w/in 30 days, al ong w/ the Notice of Submission; the clerk to assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that dft CDCR and Lieber be dismissed; and pltf's Fourteenth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and ADA claims be dismissed w/out leave to amend. Assigned and Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days.(Yin, K)
October 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve process w/in 10 days on dft Bishop signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/13/09. The clerk is directed to fwd to the USM instructions for service, summons, copies of the amended cmplt, the form re consent or request for reassignment and this order. The clerk shall also send pltf a copy of the Local Rules. (cc: USM) (Yin, K)
September 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/14/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff's claims against Leiber, Flint and Wenkler are dismissed for the reasons discussed above. Plaintiffs claim against Bishop for deliberate indifference to his medical needs, is also dismissed for the reasons discussed above. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this Order to file a second amended complaint.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Grannis, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Wesley Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nola Grannis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: -- Baughman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dale Hamad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R Loredo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Goodrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Whitted
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Y. Vasquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?