Crane v. McDonald
Petitioner: Richard Joseph Crane
Respondent: Mike McDonald
Case Number: 2:2009cv01511
Filed: May 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/31/11 ORDERING that Case No. 09-1511 EFB P is DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a cognizable claim; and Case No. 10-2604 EFB P is DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a cognizable claim. (see order for further details) CASE CLOSED(Dillon, M)
April 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/18/11 ordering within 30 days of the date of this order petitioner shall either move to consolidate case nos CIV S-09-0852 FCD EFB P, CIV S-09-1511 EFB P, and CIV S-10-2604 EFB P; or show cause why, absent consolidation, Case Nos CIV S-09-1511 EFB P and CIV S-10-2604 EFB P should not be dismissed for failure to file amended petitions in those cases within the time provide by the court. (Plummer, M)
January 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/19/11 ORDERING this action, Case No. CIV S-09-0852 FCD EFB P is related to petitioner's habeas petitions at Case No. CIV S-09-1511 DAD P. Accordingly, Case No. CIV S-09-1511 DAD P is hereby reassigned to the undersigned. The clerk is directed to make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for the reassignment. Petitioner's motions for consolidation in Case No. CIV S- 09-0852 FCD EFB P Docket Numbers 17 and 29 are denied. Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis in Case No. CIV S-10-2604 EFB P Docket Nos. 2 and 4 is granted. The petition filed in Case No. CIV S-10-2604 EFB P is dismissed. Petitioner& #039;s claim that he was placed in administrative segregation from 03/20/08 to 09/15/08 is dismissed without leave to amend, but without prejudice to petitioner's raising the claim in a civil rights action. Petitioner's claim that he has be en deprived of programs he must complete to be eligible for parole is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended petition identifying the specific parole denial he wishes to challenge, stating what findings or recommendations the BPH made that underly his claim of constitutional violation, explaining how the alleged constitutional violation impacts the duration of his confinement and otherwise complying with this order. Also, RECOM MENDING that respondent's 09/15/10 motion to dismiss in Case No. CIV S-09-0852 FCD EFB P, Docket No. 26 be granted in part and petitioner's claims regarding the validity of the 11/22/05 RVR be dismissed. Respondent be provided 30 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations to file a dispositive motion regarding the remaining parole-denial claim or to answer to the petition. Petitioner's 10/18/10 motion for summary judgment in Case No. CIV S-09-0852 EFB P, Docket No. 30 be denied. Motion to Dismiss 26 and motion for summary judgment 30 referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell. Objections due within 14 days. (cc: DAD) (Plummer, M)
September 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/13/10 ORDERING that Petitioners amended petition is DISMISSED with 30 days to file a second amended petition. Petitioners 11 request for an order to show cause is denied; Petitioners 12 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice; Clerk of the Court is directed to provide petitioner with the courts form petition for a writ of habeas corpus.(Dillon, M)
December 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/11/09 ORDERING that petitioners 5/29/09 application to proceed in forma pauperis, filed with the petition for writ of habeas corpus, is GRANTED; 4 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED as incomplete; Petitioners petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is DISMISSED with 30 days leave to amend; Clerk of the Court is directed to provide petitioner with the courts form petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a state prisoner. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crane v. McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Joseph Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mike McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?