Woods v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. et al
Scott W. Woods |
Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., GMAC Mortgage, Aurora Lending Services, LLC, Lehman Brothers and US Bank |
2:2009cv01810 |
June 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
William B. Shubb |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER of DISMISSAL signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/23/2011 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to the provisions of F.R.C.P. 41(b), for failure to prosecute. Defendants shall recover costs of suit. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G) |
Filing 80 JUDGMENT dated *10/26/2010* as to defendant Greenpoint pursuant to order signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/26/2010. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 75 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/3/10 ORDERING that Greenpoint shall make its Rule 26(a) initial disclosures on or before 10/1/10. (Owen, K) |
Filing 71 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/27/2010 ORDERING that Greenpoint's 61 Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's first cause of action as against it be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that GMAC, Auror a, and US Bank's 59 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to plaintiffs first cause of action as against them and DENIED with respect to plaintiffs fourth cause of action as against them. Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint, to the extent he can do so consistent with this Order.(Duong, D) Modified on 7/28/2010 (Duong, D). |
Filing 65 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/1/10 GRANTING Deft's 63 Request to Appear Telephonically at the motion to dismiss hearing on 7/19/10. (Owen, K) |
Filing 50 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/12/10 ORDERING that Pltf's counsel, Mr. Nations, shall appear personally before the court on 5/20/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb and SHOW CAUSE why (1) he should not be sanctioned an additional $500.00 above and beyond the $250.00 already imposed, and (2) he should not be adjudged in contempt of court, and (3) this action should not be dismissed. (Owen, K) |
Filing 49 STIPULATION and ORDER 48 Waiving Dfts' Response to the First Amended Complaint, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/11/10. Pltf will file a second amended complaint by 5/28/10 and dfts will respond to the second amended complaint within 14 days thereof.(Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/27/10 ORDERING that Deft Greenpoint's 25 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED ; Defts GMAC, Aurora, and US Bank's 27 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Pltf's second, third and fift h causes of action; Defts' 27 Motion is GRANTED in all other respects. It is further ORDERED that within 10 days Pltf's counsel shall either pay sanctions in the amount of $250 or submit a statement of good cause explaining failure to comply with LR 230(c); Pltf shall file an amended complaint within 30 days. (Owen, K) |
Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/14/2009 ordering the hearing on 6 9 all defendants' motions to dismiss scheduled for 12/7/2009 moot, vacated and withdrawn. (Kirksey Smith, K) |
Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/23/09. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/18/09 GRANTING request to appear telephonically at motion to dismiss hearing on 12/7/09. (Engbretson, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.