Henderson v. Martel
| Tommy Henderson |
| Michael Martel |
| 2:2009cv02189 |
| August 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/07/11 ordering that documents filed by petitioner since the closing date in this action will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/25/2010 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. It is recommending that Petitioners 7 October 16, 2009 renewed motion for a stay and abeyance be denied. Petitioner's 1 August 7, 2009 application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice to petitioner's filing a new petition after the challenged judgment of conviction b ecomes final. If and when he returns to federal court, petitioner should be cautioned not to file an "amended petition" in this action and not to use the case number assigned to this action on any new federal habeas petition. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/3/2010 ORDERING respondent to file an opposition or statement of no opposition to petitioner's 7 motion to stay and abeyance w/in 30 days; if opposition is filed, petitioner's reply due w/in 15 days of opposition; and the clerk to serve a copy of this order w/ petitioner's original hc petition, a copy of the renewed motion for stay and abeyance, and a copy of the form re consent or request for reassignment on Michael Farrell. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/30/09 DENYING 2 Motion for stay and abeyance without prejudice. Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file and serve a renewed motion for a stay and abeyance.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/14/09 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Henderson v. Martel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tommy Henderson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Martel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
