Aidnik v. O'Conner et al
Plaintiff: Jeff Aidnik
Defendant: Shawn O'Conner and Bill Russel
Case Number: 2:2009cv02271
Filed: August 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/14/2011 recommending that dft Russell's 27 motion to dismiss be granted; dft O'Conner be dismissed from the case and this case be closed; referred to Judge William B. Shubb ; Objections due within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Duong, D)
June 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/27/11 vacating 32 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff has 30 days from the entry of this order in which to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss of 02/16/11, or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)
June 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/6/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
April 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/2011 ORDERING that, w/in 30 days, pltf shall file an opposition/statement of non-opposition to the 27 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/11 granting 23 Motion to substiture counsel; Susan E. Coleman, Esq., of Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP, will serve as counsel of record for Defendant BILL RUSSELL in this action; 25 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED. Defendant has thirty days from the entry of this order in which to file an initial response to the complaint.(Dillon, M)
February 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jeff Aidnik signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/8/2010. CDC is to collect an monthly payments and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aidnik v. O'Conner et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeff Aidnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shawn O'Conner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Russel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?