Endsley v. Mayberg et al
Plaintiff: Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley
Defendant: Stephen Mayberg, Joseph Malancharuvil, Octavio Luna, Jon DeMorales, Cynthia Radavsky and The Office of the Director of the California Department of Mental Health
Case Number: 2:2009cv02311
Filed: August 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Luis Obispo
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/09/12 DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
December 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/29/11 ordering plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendants' motion to dismiss, filed on 11/22/11 within 21 days. Defendants 12/21/11 motion to extend the deadline for filin g a summary judgment motion 44 is partially granted and the 01/07/12 deadline is vacated; the new deadline for the filing of such a dispositive motion should it remain appropriate to do so after the resolution of the pending motion to dismiss, is extended for 30 days beyond such resolution. (Plummer, M)
October 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/17/2011 ORDERING that dfts' 39 unopposed motion to compel is GRANTED; pltf must provide, by 10/31/2011, written responses to each of dfts' productions requests as set forth in this order; pltf must also provide signed verifications no later than 10/31/2011; pltf's second premature 37 motion for partial summary judgment is VACATED from the court's calendar; once pltf has timely provided the responses and verfication s ordered herein, he should so inform the court and in doing so, re-notice the instant motion on the court's calendar; and dfts' 41 ex parte motion for an extension of time to file a motion for summary judgment is PARTIALLY GRANTED, the dispositive motions deadline is extended to 1/7/2012. (Yin, K)
May 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER vacating 33 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/11/11. (Plummer, M)
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/18/11 ORDERING 29 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; 12 Motion to Dismiss the first claim for relief is granted; This action shall proceed on the original complaint as modified by the dis missal of the claim of due process violation regarding plaintiff's transfer to Atascadero; and defendants are directed to file an answer to the modified original complaint, absent the claim regarding a violation of due process in plaintiff's transfer from Patton to Atascadero, within 28 days of the filed date of this order. (Matson, R)
November 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/19/10 ORDERING plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment filed on 09/16/10 27 is vacated without prejudice as premature. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his complaint, filed on 04/28/10, 21 is denied. Also RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to dismiss the first claim for relief, filed on 03/11/10 12 , from the original complaint be granted; and defendants be directed to file an answer to the modified original complaint, absent the claim regarding a violation of due process in plaintiff's transfer from Patton to Atascadero within 28 days of adoption of these findings and recommendations, should that occur. MOTION to DISMISS 12 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
July 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/15/2010 ORDERING that dfts have 21 days to oppose pltf's 21 motion to amend the cmplt, after which, pltf will 14 days to file a reply. (Yin, K)
April 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/14/10 ordering plaintiff's motion for a writ of mandated filed on 11/12/09 9 and his motions for ill-founded varieties of preliminary injunctions filed 03/25/10 13 , 14 , 15 are hereb y vacated as either inapposite or insufficiently supported. Plaintiff is granted 14 days (with no further extension) to show cause for his failure to oppose defendants' 03/11/10 motion to dismiss 12 and to file any opposition thereto. Any adjudication of the 1 preliminary injunction motion properly encompassed within this action shall await adjudication of the motion to dismiss. (Plummer, M)
November 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/19/09 DIRECTING USM to serve complaint filed on 8/20/09, on Stephen Mayberg, Joseph Malancharuvil, Octavio Luna, Jon DeMorales, Cynthia Radavsky. (cc: USM)(Plummer, M)
October 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/26/09 ORDERING that pltf's 2 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED; service is appropriate for dfts Stephen Mayberg, Joseph Malancharuvil, Octavio Luna, Jon DeMorales, and Cynthia Radavsky; the clerk to send pltf forms for service to be completed and returned w/in 30 days, along w/ the Notice of Submission.(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Endsley v. Mayberg et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Mayberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Malancharuvil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Octavio Luna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jon DeMorales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cynthia Radavsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Office of the Director of the California Department of Mental Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?