Vogelsang v. Zine et al
| Scott M. Vogelsang |
| Laura Zine, Vicki Bennett, Jeffrey Dubsick, Jerry Lynn Hurst, Becky Larsen, Vivian Auble, Jean Stone, Cigna-Medicare, Electronic Data Systems LLC, CA Dept of Healthcare Services, Traci Waldheim, California Department of Justice and US Dept of Health and Human Services |
| 2:2009cv02885 |
| October 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| El Dorado |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| John A. Mendez |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/9/2010 recommending that this action be dismissed and Clerk be directed to close this case. Parties may file objections to these findings and recommendations 14 days after being served.(Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/29/2010 DENYING Vicki Bennett's 40 Motion to Proceed IFP, without prejudice, since defendant is currently under no obligation to prepay any filing fees. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/12/10 ORDERING that the hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss is continued to 5/13/10; Defendant is directed to forthwith file with this court the proof of servic e upon plaintiff of her pending motion to dismiss. If defendant failed to serve plaintiff with the motion to dismiss, defendant must so notify the court, and in which case defendant may renotice the motion and shall properly serve it as required by t he Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable Local Rules; Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 4/29/10, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of nonopposition to the pending motion; Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 5/5/10; Failure of plaintiff to file an opposition will be deemed a statement of nonopposition to the pending motion, and may result in an adverse ruling, including but not limited to a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution; and Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 5/6/10. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/26/2010 ORDERING the January 28, 2010 hearing on the motions to dismiss, filed December 7, 23,29, and 30, 2009, (dkt. #s 23, 25, 28, 29, and 31), is vacated; and the motions are submitted on the record.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/22/2009 ORDERING that the pltf shall submit the appropriate filing fee within 20 days. (Suttles, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
