J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Hernandez
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. |
Juan Jose Hernandez |
2:2009cv03389 |
December 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Garland E. Burrell |
Kendall J. Newman |
None |
47 U.S.C. ยง 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/20/11 GRANTING 22 Motion to Appoint Receiver. Sheri L. Carello is appointed as a receiver; The receiver shall be compensated at the expense of Defendant by way of a percentage of the amount recover ed from the sale of Defendants liquor license. The receiver also shall receive judicial approval from this Court before any referenced expense, fee, or service is incurred; and the service of payment shall be specified in the approval request; Defendant is restrained from selling, transferring, or otherwise disposing of his liquor license bearing number 456047; Status Conference set for 8/29/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/30/2010 ORDERING that the Proposed 17 Findings and Recommendations filed May 14, 2010, are ADOPTED. Plaintiff's 12 application for default judgment against defendant Juan Jose Hernandez, ind ividually and doing business as Mazatlan Tacos y Mariscos also known as Mariscos Mazatlan, is GRANTED. The court shall enter judgment against defendant on plaintiff's claims brought. The court awards statutory damages in the amount of $10,000.00 to plaintiff. This case is closed. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D) |
Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/14/10: Recommending that plaintiff's application for default judgment against defendant Juan Jose Hernandez, individually and d/b/a Mazatlan Tacos y Mariscos a/k/a Ma riscos Mazatlan be granted 12 . The court enter judgment against defendant on plaintiff's claims brought pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(a) and 47 U.S.C. § 553(a). The court award statutory damages in an amount of $10,000.00 to plaintiff. This case be closed. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/25/10 Continuing Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment or SHOW CAUSE in writing by 4/30/10 at 4:00 p.m, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Status Conference is continued to 5/24/10 at 9:00 a.m. (Donati, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Hernandez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: J & J Sports Productions, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Thomas Peter Riley, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Juan Jose Hernandez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.