Miller v. Jenesky et al
| Ernest Miller |
| E. Jenesky, D. Asipnall, Liberty, Mental Health Staff and S. Sader |
| 2:2009cv03427 |
| November 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/8/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER adopting in full 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/28/2010. Pltf's 9 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED. Pltf is directed to pay in full the $350 filing fee within 21 days of the filing date of this order. Pltf's 8 Motion for prelim injunction is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/15/09 ORDERING that pltf has 30 days to submit either the filing fee or the application to proceed IFP. The Clerk to mail an IFP application to pltf. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/9/2009, Case Transferred to Sacramento Division. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
