Randall v. Kimura, et al
| Jerald Randall |
| T. Kimura, D. Swingle, J Nepomuceno and Wrigley |
| 2:2010cv00052 |
| January 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John F. Moulds |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/18/2012 GRANTING defendants' 69 Ex Parte Request vacating deadline to file Dispositive Motion. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
68
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 09/11/12 recommending that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/30/12 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/30/12; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The parties may conduct discovery until July 20, 2012. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All requests for discovery pursuan t to Fed. R. Civ. P. 31, 33, 34 or 36 shall be served not later than sixty days prior to that date. 2. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before October 12, 2012. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of this courts order filed November 16, 2010. 3. Pretrial conference and trial dates will be set, as appropriate, following adjudication of any dispositive motion, or the expiration of time for filing such a motion. 4. In all other respects, the provisions of the discovery and scheduling order filed in this action on August 31, 2011 remain in full force and effect.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER ADOPTING 59 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/20/12 DENYING 28 Motion to Dismiss ; dft Swingle shall answer the first amended complaint within 10 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/7/12 ORDERING that Defendants 58 request to vacate the deadlines set in the discovery and scheduling order filed August 31, 2011 is granted; The deadlines set for completion of discovery and filing of pretrial motions are vacated and will be reset, as appropriate, by further order of the court. It is RECOMMENDED that 28 Motion to Dismiss be denied; and Defendant Swingle be directed to answer the first amended complaint within ten days from the date of any order by the district court adopting these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER ADOPTING 53 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/08/11 and ORDERING that plaintiff's 40 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/21/11 ADOPTING in full 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant Kimura is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/14/2011 ORDERING 49 Motion to conduct the deposition of Jerald Randall and all witnesses via videoconference is GRANTED; nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
53
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/04/11 recommending that plaintiff's 07/01/11 motion for preliminary injunction be denied. Motion for Preliminary Injunction 40 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/9/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 6/6/11, are adopted in full; Defendant Wrigley's 2/14/11 motion to dismiss is denied; and Defendant Wrigley shall answer the first amended complaint within ten days from the date of this order. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 07/28/11 ordering that within 10 days from the date of this order defendants shall file a complete copy of plaintiff's medical records from January 2008 through the present. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/25/2011. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 06/06/11 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a U.S. District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this act ion. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant Wrigley's 02/14/11 motion to dismiss be denied; and defendant Wrigley be directed to answer the first amended complaint within 10 days from the date of any order by the district court adopting these findings and recommendations. MOTION to DISMISS 22 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 05/26/11 ordering that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/25/11 ORDERING that within 30 days, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the 22 MOTION to DISMISS or a statement of non-opposition.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/2/2010 DENYING pltf's 18 motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
