Campbell v. Jacquez
Petitioner: James W. Campbell
Respondent: Francisco Jacquez
Case Number: 2:2010cv00114
Filed: November 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 3/27/14. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Court declines to issue COA. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
May 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/10/13 ordering on or before 07/12/13, petitioner shall file and serve a 4th amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus which shall not contain any claims other than the 5 exhausted claims presented by petitioner to the state courts on direct appeal. Respondent's response to the 4th amended petition shall be filed and served on or before 08/12/13. (Plummer, M)
May 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 CJA 20 APPOINTING ATTORNEY signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/28/2012 Attorney Mark D. Eibert for James W. Campbell. (Reader, L)
February 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/20/13 ORDERING that 48 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED; Petitioners appointed counsel shall have until April 22, 2013 to file the status report as required by the courts order filed on November 7, 2012; and the status conference currently set for March 8, 2013 is vacated and re-set for May 10, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned.(Dillon, M)
November 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/28/12 ORDERING that the request for substitution of counsel 42 filed on November 27, 2012, is granted; and Mark Eibert, Attorney at Law, is substituted as appointed counsel for petitioner in place of the Office of the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California.(Dillon, M)
November 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/6/2012 ORDERING that the Federal Defender is APPOINTED to represent petitioner; the Clerk to serve a copy of the 37 third amended petition and this order on David Porter; a status conference is S ET for 1/4/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd; 14 days prior to the conference, petitioner's counsel shall file and serve a status report in accordance with this order; respondent may file a response to petitioner's status report 7 days prior to the status conference. (cc: David Porter)(Yin, K)
June 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/13/11 ordering the second amended petition filed on 05/23/11 35 is dismissed. Within 30 days from the service of this order, petitioner shall file his 3rd amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. The clerk of the court is directed to provide petitioner with the form petition for a section 2254 action. (Plummer, M)
April 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/6/2011 ORDERING that the 3/10/2011 amended petition is DISMISSED; ptnr has 30 days to file a second amended petition; and the clerk to provide ptnr w/ a habeas corpus form. (Yin, K)
February 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 2/23/2011 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 are ADOPTED in FULL; Respondent's 20 motion to dismiss is GRANTED in PART; Within 30 days from the service of this order, petitioner shall file an amended petition containing only his exhausted grounds for relief; the Clerk of the Court is directed to provide petitioner a copy of the court's form petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a state prisoner. (Attachments: # 1 Petition)(Reader, L)
December 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/14/10 ORDERING the order to show cause filed on 05/03/10 2 is discharged. Also, RECOMMENDING that respondent's 03/15/10 motion to dismiss 20 be granted in part. The following sub-claims within petitioner's state first ground for relief be dismissed as unexhausted: sub-claim (a) alleging that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to cross-examine witnesses; and sub-claim (c) th at alleging that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to the exclusion of state-of-mind evidence at petitioner's trial. Petitioner be ordered to file an amended petition containing only his exhausted grounds for relief. MOTION to DISMISS 20 referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
May 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/3/10: Petitioner show cause, within twenty days, why respondent's March 15, 2010 motion to dismiss should not be granted. (Kaminski, H)
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/25/2010 DIRECTING respondent to file a response to the petition w/in 60 days; reply due w/in 30 days of answer; if response is a motion, opposition or statement of non-opposition due w/in 30 days of motion, reply due w/in 15 days thereafter; the clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell)(Yin, K)
January 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TRANSFERRRING CASE to SACRAMENTO Division signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/12/2010. New Case Number 2:10-cv-00114-DAD (HC). Old Case Number 1:09-cv-02003-JLT (HC). (Jessen, A)
November 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/24/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell v. Jacquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James W. Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Francisco Jacquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?